CO129-123 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [7] — Page 99

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

97

the matter was brought to the cognizance of O. & T. The Governor was the result of His Excellency's direction by Sir R. Alcock to the Consul at Canton to take evidence on certain points and accordingly in October 1866 Quok Achung himself with a European Engineer and Chinese witnesses were examined before Mr. Mayers, Vice Consul, in my presence though this Gentleman, under Consul Robertson's orders, refused to allow Counsel to conduct the examination. There was also a Notarial Declaration establishing beyond all doubt the truth of the matter and the loss of the S.S. [likely "Sunk" should be the name of the ship, but it is unclear; assuming it is correct as is] forwarded to the Government to the Consul for Sir R. Alcock's information.

These facts shew conclusively that there were no laches on the part of Quok Achung only, and that it was when the Consular Authorities declined to act further that he applied to the Governor of Hong Kong.

Counsel in the case state confidently that the evidence was so consistent throughout as to be indisputable in support of Quok Achung's statements, and it is worthy of note in this behalf that the only evidence taken or adduced by the Chinese Customs was to prove the presence of the Steamer in a Treaty Port and I state unhesitatingly...

Edit History

2026-05-19 18:47:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
97 the matter was brought to the cognizance of O. & T. The Governor was the result of His Excellency's direction by Sir R. Alcock to the Consul at Canton to take evidence on certain points and accordingly in October 1866 Quok Achung himself with a European Engineer and Chinese witnesses were examined before Mr. Mayers, Vice Consul, in my presence though this Gentleman, under Consul Robertson's orders, refused to allow Counsel to conduct the examination. There was also a Notarial Declaration establishing beyond all doubt the truth of the matter and the loss of the S.S. [likely "Sunk" should be the name of the ship, but it is unclear; assuming it is correct as is] forwarded to the Government to the Consul for Sir R. Alcock's information. These facts shew conclusively that there were no laches on the part of Quok Achung only, and that it was when the Consular Authorities declined to act further that he applied to the Governor of Hong Kong. Counsel in the case state confidently that the evidence was so consistent throughout as to be indisputable in support of Quok Achung's statements, and it is worthy of note in this behalf that the only evidence taken or adduced by the Chinese Customs was to prove the presence of the Steamer in a Treaty Port and I state unhesitatingly...
Baseline (Original)
b 97 the matter avas Funder. brought cognizance of O. &t. The Governot - Was The result of His Excer Excellency's ttction dvicction by Sir R. Alcock to the Consul at Counton to lake evidence on certain points and accordingly in October 1866 Quot Achaung himself with م في مواج Pcxrapeon Engineer. and Chinese Mitnesses were examined before Mr. Mayers Vice Consul in my presence though. :this Gentleman under Consul Robertsoné viders refused to allow Counsel to conduct the examination - There was also A the Notarial Declaration establishing beyourt all doubt the truth of th mutter and the loss of the Sunk forwarded the Government to the Consul for Sir I. Alcock's information. these there Daa facts shew conclusively that laches ا مجھ کو 077 the part of Acheong only Quck Ach and that it was when the Consular Authorities declined to act further further that he applied to the Governor of Hongthing - Das Counsel in the cave CCTV state confidently that the evidence was so consistent thr. throughout do be indispertable in support of Quok Achung's statements, and it is :thy of note in this behalf that the only evidence laken or adduced by the Chinese Customs was to prove the presence of the Stowmer in a treaty Fort and I state unhesitatingly den
2026-05-19 18:47:25 · Baseline
View content

b

97

the matter avas

Funder.

brought

cognizance of O. &t. The Governot -

Was

The result

of

His Excer

Excellency's

ttction

dvicction

by

Sir R. Alcock to

the Consul at Counton to lake evidence

on certain points and accordingly in

October 1866 Quot Achaung himself with

م في مواج

Pcxrapeon Engineer.

and

Chinese

Mitnesses were examined before Mr. Mayers

Vice Consul in

my

presence though.

:this Gentleman under Consul Robertsoné

viders refused to allow Counsel to conduct

the examination - There was also

A

the

Notarial Declaration establishing beyourt

all doubt the truth of th mutter and the loss of the Sunk

forwarded

the Government to the

Consul for Sir I. Alcock's information.

these

there

Daa

facts

shew

conclusively

that

laches

ا مجھ کو

077

the part of

Acheong

only

Quck Ach

and that it was

when the Consular Authorities

declined to act further

further that he applied to the Governor of Hongthing -

Das Counsel in the cave

CCTV

state confidently that the evidence

was so consistent

thr.

throughout

do

be indispertable in support of Quok Achung's statements, and it is

:thy of note in this behalf that the only evidence laken or adduced by the Chinese Customs was to prove the presence of the Stowmer in a

treaty Fort and I state unhesitatingly

den

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.